Published: Sunday, March
4, 2001 Edition: METRO Section: BUSINESS
Page#: 01D
High wire act // As electric power producers push to build more
generating facilities and transmission lines, some consumers and
environmentalists fear the path to energy abundance will literally run
through their back yards, or over some of the Midwest's most treasured
scenery.
Steve Alexander; Staff Writer
Growing demand for electricity in the Twin Cities metro area has
sparked plans to build new high-voltage power lines and upgrade many
others.
But those high-voltage transmission lines aren't always popular with
homeowners and conservationists. Some of the planned power lines _ even
those considered vital by electric utilities such as Xcel Energy in
Minneapolis _ have met with strong resistance from local residents and
started a debate over whom the power lines benefit and hurt.
Xcel says growing demand in the metro area could mean power shortages
if some critical projects aren't completed in the next five years.
``The sky isn't falling, but we are starting to outgrow our current
[power line] infrastructure,'' said Don Jones, Xcel's transmission
reliability director in Minneapolis.
Such warnings have gained credence in the wake of January's rolling
blackouts in California. Those limited blackouts, which were in response
to power shortages, spread across the northern half of California and
affected hundreds of thousands of homes and businesses for as long as two
hours.
Despite that, Xcel's power line plans have some harsh critics.
In Chisago County, northeast of the Twin Cities, an upgraded power line
that would cross the St. Croix River at Taylors Falls is opposed by local
residents on environmental and aesthetic grounds. The opponents are
questioning whether the upgrade is needed locally or if it is merely an
electricity highway that would enable Xcel to sell bulk power to points
east of Minnesota.
In the southeast metro area, the cities of Mendota Heights, South St.
Paul and Sunfish Lake are caught up in a public debate over whether their
power lines should be upgraded in light of purported health issues and
their distance from the business customers who allegedly would benefit
most from the new lines.
Xcel counters that all of its proposed Twin Cities projects are needed
because of projected growth in local electrical demand, although western
Wisconsin also would benefit from the line in Chisago County.
Xcel's proposed southeast metro upgrade would add a second 115,000-volt
line that would share poles with the existing line of the same capacity.
Only about 5 miles of the proposed 15-mile upgrade are being challenged
by residents, who say they fear negative health effects of magnetic fields
from the upgraded power lines, although there appears to be little
scientific evidence to support their claims.
Frank Tiffany, a retired physician who is the mayor of Sunfish Lake,
said he's unconvinced that magnetic fields from power lines pose health
hazards. He said the Minnesota Department of Health recently reviewed
medical literature on the subject and found no convincing evidence of
health hazards.
Xcel agrees. Independent scientific studies done over the past 20 years
``have failed to conclude there are harmful effects'' from power line
magnetic fields, said Steve LaCasse, an Xcel consulting engineer in
Minneapolis. ``That's our position.''
Joe Turenne, a South St. Paul resident, opposes the southeast power
line upgrade for health reasons because the existing line passes close to
his home. Turenne wants the line buried. He says _ and Xcel's LaCasse
agrees _ that burying the line would minimize the reach of its magnetic
field.
``If Xcel were interested in peoples' health, it would bury the power
line,'' Turenne said.
Who pays?
But Xcel says it won't bury a power line unless city governments or
local rate payers agree to foot the bill for the difference in cost.
Patrick Cline, an Xcel community relations manager in Edina, said it costs
Xcel five to 10 times as much to bury a power line than it would to put it
on poles.
But Roger Conant, a Sunfish Lake resident, argues that
new medical evidence shows that the magnetic fields surrounding the
southeast metro power line are unhealthy, and that they would get worse in
the future if the line were upgraded.
Conant and Xcel agree that, for technical reasons,
upgrading the line temporarily would lower the magnetic field. But that
won't last. As Xcel fills the capacity of the two lines with more power,
the magnetic fields will grow to the intensity of the original single
power line.
As a result, Conant not only wants to block the power
line upgrade but insists on having the existing power line removed because
it is too close to some homes. After failing to convince the Minnesota
Public Utilities Commission to order the line removed on safety grounds, Conant has taken his case to the Minnesota Court of
Appeals.
``There are cheap and available alternatives that would allow Xcel to
reroute the lines away from homes. The consultant hired by the three
affected cities identified several alternatives that don't go near homes,
and they are not that much more expensive,'' Conant said.
Tiffany is concerned about the location of the power line for a
different reason: He believes the power line upgrade would inconvenience
the wrong people _ citizens of Sunfish Lake _ rather than the people who
will need additional electric power in the future, who he believes are
those along Interstate Hwy. 494 near the Mall of America.
``This is not the part of the line that needs more power. It is the
west part of the line, in Bloomington and Eagan. And Xcel can route more
power into that area from other directions,'' Tiffany said.
Xcel maintains that it is impossible to determine where the electricity
passing through the upgraded southeast metro line will go because the
electric grid is interconnected.
.
A conflict of interest
Why Tiffany and the other southeast mayors know so much about Xcel's
alternatives represents one of the stranger twists in the story between
Xcel and the power line opponents.
The cities wanted more information about the proposed power line
upgrade project before approving it, but told Xcel they couldn't afford to
hire a consultant to study the project. As a result, Xcel agreed to pay
the $140,000 cost of hiring a consultant, even though Tiffany agreed the
move appeared to be a conflict of interest.
What's more, the consulting firm the cities hired, Commonwealth
Associates of Jackson, Mich., was the same firm Xcel had hired to design
the proposed power line upgrade. As a result, Commonwealth stands to earn
$150,000 in additional fees from Xcel if the power line project goes
through, Xcel confirmed.
Tiffany said a committee of the mayors of the three cities knew about
that potential conflict of interest, too, but chose Commonwealth anyway
because it appeared to be the most qualified consulting firm.
The hiring of the Xcel-employed consulting firm angered power line
opponents. Turenne charged that the three mayors ``are in no way looking
out for our interests'' because they hired Commonwealth, a firm ``which is
not impartial.''
But the questionable consulting relationship might not benefit Xcel in
the end. Even though Commonwealth's study recommended the upgrade Xcel has
proposed, Tiffany said the city councils in Mendota Heights, South St.
Paul and Sunfish Lake might take a different approach.
Rather than grant Xcel the permits needed for the upgrade, they might
deny them on the grounds that the Commonwealth study identified other Twin
Cities power lines that Xcel could upgrade instead _ lines that are closer
to the I-494 strip.
``I feel we have an arguable case for finding alternative ways to bring
power into the growth areas in Bloomington and Eagan,'' Tiffany said.
.
Aesthetic concerns
In Chisago County, opponents of the planned 15-mile stretch of an
upgraded power line (another 25 miles would be in Wisconsin) won a
political victory in 1998 when the state Commerce Department advised
regulators not to allow Xcel to upgrade the power line from 69,000 to
230,000 volts because the increased capacity wasn't needed by local
residents.
Xcel then withdrew the proposal from state regulators, reduced the
proposed capacity of the upgraded line to 161,000 volts (below the level
state regulators must approve) and appealed to city and county governments
to approve it instead. So far, the cities of Taylors Falls and St. Croix
Falls, Wis., have agreed to the upgrade project, but Chisago County and
some of the other cities in it have not.
Xcel asserts that the power line upgrade would benefit both the growing
northeast metro area and customers in rural Wisconsin. Opponents say their
area doesn't need such a large power line, and that Xcel really is
building the high-voltage line to sell bulk power to Wisconsin and other
states to the east.
.
Who benefits?
Peter Nelson, mayor of Lindstrom, Minn., one of the cities affected by
the proposed power line upgrade, said Xcel ``wants to build a power line
of such a size that its sole purpose is not to serve any of us but instead
to sell power all the way to eastern Wisconsin and beyond.''
Added Tom Martin, a Chisago County resident who is chairman of a power
line opposition group, Concerned River Valley Citizens: ``This is a
gimmick for Xcel to get a high-power transfer line, because with electric
utility deregulation they want to be wholesale power shippers. They can
make billions of dollars off this line by shipping power from west to
east.''
Xcel denies the charge.
``That perception is out there, and has been from the beginning, and
it's just simply not true,'' said Jim Alders, a manager of regulatory
administration for Xcel. ``We have a number of serious electrical system
reliability issues in northwestern Wisconsin and east central Minnesota
that we're trying to deal with. The proposed Chisago line is not an effort
expand our ability to trade power.
``We need the line, and we need it here. If we do nothing we'll place a
lot of people at risk'' of electrical shortages, he said.
The problem, Alders said, is that it's not feasible for Xcel to
distinguish between the electricity needs of its Minnesota and Wisconsin
residents (the project is a joint venture with the Wisconsin utility
Dairyland Power) when building a power line.
``The electrical world doesn't know that a border is there,'' he said.
Nelson, Lindstrom's mayor, said the Chisago power line upgrade also is
opposed because of the power line's magnetic field and because the line
would mar the natural beauty of the county _ which contains a game refuge
and two state parks _ and the St. Croix River, designated a National Wild
and Scenic Riverway.
Xcel and the local governments are negotiating, but based on local
regulatory timetables it seems the standoff could continue into next year
_ six years after Xcel originally proposed the 230,000-volt power line
upgrade.
Said Tiffany: ``Xcel will face the `not in my back yard' situation
wherever they want to install or upgrade power lines.''
.
Steve Alexander can be contacted at alex@startribune.com
.
Proposed power line upgrades
To deal with increasing demands for electricity, Xcel Energy is
proposing many power line upgrades and some new power lines throughout the
metro area. Two power line upgrade projects, in the southeast metro area
and Chisago County, are opposed by some local residents who cite health or
environmental concerns or believe the upgrades are unnecessary.
|